C Covenant

Every answer carries its citation.

Covenant reads an association's recorded declaration, bylaws and rules, then answers questions about them in the words of the documents themselves — with the article and section attached.

Licensed to community management companies. One agreement covers every association in the portfolio.

Owner at Lot 47 asks

Can I put a six-foot privacy fence along my rear property line?

Rear-yard fences need prior written approval and must conform to the Exhibit H specifications. The lot also carries a five-foot drainage easement along the rear line, which the proposed placement would sit inside.

Art. XI §11.2 — Fences and walls
Declaration of Covenants
No fence shall be erected in a rear yard without the prior written approval of the Executive Board.
Art. IV §5.6 — Drainage swale easement
Declaration of Covenants
A five (5) foot easement is reserved along the rear lot line for drainage and maintenance access.
Reviewed 12 sectionsBoard decides — this is advisory

The documents already hold the answer. Finding it is the job.

A community manager fields the same questions every week — fence heights, satellite dishes, lease terms, paint colors, parking. The answers sit in a recorded declaration nobody wants to open, a set of bylaws amended twice, and rules the board adopted three Novembers ago.

So the manager answers from memory, or spends twenty minutes reading, or asks counsel. Do that across a portfolio and it is not twenty minutes. It is the week.

From a resident's request to recorded precedent

One path, in order. Each stage leaves a record the next one can use.

Day one

The request arrives

An owner submits a change through the portal and the response clock starts. Missing dimensions and materials are the commonest reason a review stalls, so the form asks for them up front.

Minutes later

Covenant screens it against the documents

The request is read against the association's own governing documents and its past decisions. The result is a findings ledger: rule by rule, each with the covenant text quoted and where it came from. It reports; it does not decide.

Before the meeting

The board sees the reasoning, not a verdict

Volunteers open a packet showing which provisions apply, which conflict, and what could not be verified. They vote. A written reason is required on every decision.

Afterward

The decision becomes precedent

The vote is recorded with the rules that were in force when it was made. When a similar request arrives in two years — under a board with none of the same members — that reasoning is still there and still citable.

Built for the firm, not for one board

A self-managed board feels this pain monthly. A management company feels it every day, across every community it holds — and it is the firm, not the board, that carries the exposure when an architectural review goes sideways.

So Covenant is built around the firm. Staff work a portfolio, not a single account. Documents, decisions and residents stay strictly separated by association — that boundary is enforced in the database, not in the interface — while the people who need to move between them can.

What this looks like for a management company →

Who holds the licenseThe management company
Associations coveredEvery one in the portfolio
Who assigns communitiesThe firm's administrator
Who votes on a requestThe board, always
Data crossing associationsNone

Reference for boards and managers

Plain-language explainers on the documents themselves — free, no sign-up.

Already a client?

Board members, community managers and owners sign in to the Covenant portal to ask questions, submit and track architectural requests, and read their association's documents.

Sign in to the portal

Bring your documents. We'll show you your own covenants.

Send one association's declaration and rules. We'll index them and walk your team through the questions your managers actually get asked.